Address: Regio VI, Insula 7
Area: 712 square meters
Rooms: 13
The House of Apollo, archaeologically designated as VI.7.23
(Regio VI, Insula 7, Entrance 23), is a well-preserved ancient Roman
domus in Pompeii, Italy, exemplifying the blend of Samnite origins
and later Roman refinements in urban residential architecture.
Located on the north side of Via di Mercurio—a prominent street in
the city's northern sector—this mid-sized house derives its name
from a cycle of frescoes depicting the myth of Apollo, particularly
scenes in the rear garden area, including an image of the god
enthroned beneath a canopy. Alternative names include Casa di
Apollo, Domus A. Herenuleius Communis (possibly linked to an owner
or resident named A. or L. Herennuleius Communis), and occasionally
references to its mythological decorations like Apollo and Marsyas.
The house reflects the lifestyle of Pompeii's affluent middle class,
likely a wealthy trader rather than aristocracy, and was buried
under volcanic ash during the 79 AD eruption of Mount Vesuvius,
preserving its intricate artworks. It forms part of the Pompeii
Archaeological Park and is notable for its Fourth Style wall
paintings and mosaics, now mostly housed in the National
Archaeological Museum of Naples.
The House of Apollo dates to Pompeii's Samnite period (pre-80 BC),
making it one of the city's older dwellings, with structural elements
and materials attesting to its ancient origins. After Pompeii became a
Roman colony in 80 BC, the house was expanded and redecorated,
incorporating Hellenistic influences in its art. This evolution mirrors
the city's cultural transition from Italic roots to Roman imperial
styles. Ownership is uncertain, but inscriptions and the name
Herennuleius Communis suggest a connection to a local elite involved in
commerce, as the house's modest yet ornate design implies prosperity
from trade rather than noble lineage.
Excavation occurred in the
1830s, during the Bourbon-era digs that uncovered much of Regio VI.
Initial explorations revealed the house's layout and decorations, though
some elements, like mosaics, were removed for museum display. Later
studies, including photographic documentation from the 20th century
(e.g., 1968 photos of frescoes), have aided conservation. The site
suffered from post-excavation decay and wartime damage but has benefited
from modern restoration efforts under the Great Pompeii Project,
stabilizing structures and artworks. No human remains or major
eruption-related tragedies are specifically noted here, unlike some
nearby houses.
The house follows a traditional Roman domus plan, adapted from its
Samnite core, with an axial layout emphasizing progression from
public to private spaces. The entrance from Via di Mercurio leads
into a fauces (vestibule) and atrium, the central hall with an
impluvium for rainwater collection. Surrounding the atrium are
service rooms, cubicula (bedrooms), and a tablinum (study or
reception room) for business. The structure incorporates tufa and
opus incertum masonry, typical of early Pompeian builds, with later
additions in brick and plaster.
Key rooms include:
Atrium
and Tablinum: The atrium serves as the hub, with painted walls and
access to side rooms. The tablinum, at the rear, overlooks the
garden.
Cubiculum (Bedroom): In the northwest corner of the
garden, this small room features a square window and ornate walls,
possibly used as a bedroom or study.
Triclinium: A dining room,
including a summer triclinium in the garden for outdoor meals,
supported by porticos.
The overall footprint is modest compared
to grander villas like the House of the Faun, but it efficiently
integrates indoor and outdoor elements for light, ventilation, and
leisure.
The rear garden is a highlight, featuring a terrace with painted plaster walls and a portico for shade. It includes a summer triclinium at the back, backed by a north wall with three niches—likely for statues or shrines—and mock architectural elements resembling a theater facade. This space emphasizes Roman horticultural ideals, blending nature with art for relaxation and dining, though eruption damage erased much vegetation evidence.
Decorations are in the Fourth Style (ca. 45–79 AD), characterized by
intricate, illusionistic designs with mythological themes. Frescoes
dominate the cubiculum and garden walls, including:
A central
sacred tree on the cubiculum's south wall, flanked by landscapes
with a man and horse.
A large sacred landscape on the bedroom's
outer south wall.
A red band with shields resembling trophies on
the garden walls.
Apollo enthroned under a gabled aedicula with
gold fretwork in the garden, alongside scenes of Apollo and Marsyas.
These vivid, colorful paintings create trompe-l'œil effects,
simulating architecture and nature, and reflect Hellenistic
influences popular in late Pompeii.
Mosaics enhance the
walls, particularly around the cubiculum entrance and garden:
Opus vermiculatum panels using limestone, glass paste, and
shells for vibrant effects.
Prominent artifacts are the removed mosaics, now in Naples:
Three
Graces (Inv. 10004): Depicts three dancing goddesses in polychrome,
symbolizing beauty and creativity, dated to the mid-1st century AD.
Achilles Confronting Agamemnon (Inv. 10006): Shows Achilles,
restrained by Athena, drawing his sword against Agamemnon, with a
slave girl; a dramatic Iliad scene.
Achilles Recognized by
Odysseus at Skyros: On the bedroom's east wall, illustrating a
Trojan War myth.
These high-quality pieces highlight advanced
Roman mosaic techniques. No other major finds like statues or
household goods are detailed, though the house's name ties to Apollo
imagery.
The House of Apollo offers valuable insights into Pompeii's domestic life, bridging Samnite and Roman eras through its architecture and art. Its mythological frescoes and mosaics exemplify Fourth Style innovation, providing evidence of cultural syncretism and elite tastes in mythology (e.g., Apollo as patron of arts). As a UNESCO site, it contributes to studies on Roman gardens, wall decoration, and social history, illustrating how mid-level wealth enabled luxurious yet functional homes. Though not always open due to conservation, it attracts scholars for its preserved narratives of ancient daily and mythical worlds.