Rostral Columns (Saint Petersburg)

Birzhevaya Ploschchad
Bus: 7, 10, 47, K-47, K-128, K- 129, K- 147, K- 187, K- 228, K- 252
Trolley: 1, 7, 10

 

The Rostral Columns are iconic architectural monuments located on the Spit (Strelka) of Vasilievsky Island in Saint Petersburg, Russia, at Birzhevaya Ploshchad (Stock Exchange Square). Erected in 1811, these 32-meter-tall, terra-cotta-red columns were designed by French architect Jean-François Thomas de Thomon as part of the Old Saint Petersburg Stock Exchange ensemble. Originally serving as navigational beacons for the city’s port, they symbolize Russia’s naval prowess and maritime heritage, drawing inspiration from ancient Roman rostral columns adorned with the prows of defeated ships. Decorated with bronze ship prows, anchors, and allegorical sculptures representing Russia’s major rivers, the columns are a striking feature of Saint Petersburg’s UNESCO World Heritage-listed historic center.

 

Historical Background

The Rostral Columns were conceived during the early 19th-century redevelopment of Vasilievsky Island’s Spit, a strategic point where the Neva River splits into the Bolshaya Neva and Malaya Neva. In the 18th century, this area housed Saint Petersburg’s main port, established in 1733 to facilitate trade with Western Europe. By 1805, as the city’s commercial and cultural ambitions grew under Alexander I, architect Thomas de Thomon was tasked with designing a grand ensemble centered on the Stock Exchange (now the Central Naval Museum). The columns, completed in 1811, were integral to this vision, serving both practical and symbolic purposes.

Practically, the columns functioned as beacons to guide ships navigating the Neva’s channels during long, dark nights and foggy conditions. Oil-filled braziers at their tops were lit in the 19th century, with spiral staircases inside allowing access to the lamps. By 1885, the port relocated to the Gulf of Finland to accommodate larger vessels, and the beacons were decommissioned, though gas torches replaced oil in 1957 for ceremonial use.

Symbolically, the columns celebrated Russia’s naval victories, particularly in the Great Northern War (1700–1721) against Sweden and the Russo-Turkish Wars (1768–1878), including the Battle of Chesme (1770). Following ancient Roman tradition, where rostral columns displayed the prows (rostra, Latin for “ship’s beak”) of captured enemy ships, Thomon adorned the columns with bronze prows to signify Russian maritime supremacy. This echoed Peter the Great’s vision of Saint Petersburg as a great port city, a legacy the columns embody despite his death in 1725, before their construction.

The columns were built during a period of Russian imperial confidence, with the Stock Exchange ensemble reflecting Greek Revival architecture inspired by the Temple of Hera at Paestum. They were restored three times—in 1926–1928, 1947–1949, and 1998–1999—to repair damage from the Great Patriotic War (1941–1945) and weathering, with lost metal parts replaced by replicas. Their enduring presence has made them a postcard staple, alongside landmarks like the Palace Bridge and Winter Palace, and they even appeared on Russian 50-ruble (1997) and 50,000-ruble (1995) banknotes.

 

Architectural Features

The Rostral Columns are a pair of 32-meter-tall (105 feet) Doric columns, constructed from brick coated with deep terra-cotta-red stucco, a hue that shifts to yellow-orange under street lighting at night. They sit on massive granite plinths, blending Greek Revival elegance with Roman martial symbolism, and are positioned symmetrically on either side of the Stock Exchange, framing a semicircular overlook onto the Neva River.

Structure and Decoration: Each column is adorned with eight bronze ship prows (rostra), arranged in four pairs, symbolizing naval victories. The prows, cast by craftsmen Shapov, Vasiliev, and Korolkov, are “fake” in that they represent no specific captured ships, unlike Roman originals, but their copper construction enhances their visual impact. Bronze anchors, seahorses, crocodiles, fish, and water nymphs decorate the prows, adding mythological flair. The largest prows, at the base, face the Neva and Stock Exchange, with one featuring a river goddess and another a crocodile head.
River Allegories: At the base of each column sit two monumental marble sculptures, carved from Pudost stone (a limestone from Gatchina that hardens after extraction). These allegorical figures, created by sculptors Jozef Camberlein (Dnieper) and Jacques Thibault (Volga, Neva, Volkhov), with assistance from Russian serf sculptor Samson Sukhanov, represent Russia’s major rivers: the Volga (2,193 miles) and Dnieper (1,368 miles) at the northern column (closer to Palace Bridge), and the Neva (46 miles) and Volkhov (139 miles) at the southern column (near Exchange Bridge). Thomon intended them as deities of sea and commerce, but local historians later interpreted them as river allegories, reflecting Russia’s vast geography.
Brazier Lamps: Atop each column, a 7-meter (23-foot) metal tripod holds a bowl-shaped lamp, originally oil-filled to serve as a beacon. Spiral staircases inside the columns lead to these platforms, though public access is prohibited. Since 1957, gas torches, fed by internal pipelines, are lit during holidays like Victory Day (May 9), Navy Day (last Sunday in July), and Saint Petersburg City Day (May 27), creating a dramatic spectacle visible across the Neva.
Surroundings: The columns are part of the Strelka’s architectural ensemble, with the Stock Exchange’s neoclassical portico as the focal point. The Neva’s embankment, with circular ramps descending to a jetty, frames the columns, offering panoramic views of the Winter Palace, Peter and Paul Fortress, and Hermitage. The adjacent park, with benches and trees, is a popular photo spot, though modern elements like portaloos occasionally disrupt the historical ambiance, as noted by photographers.
The columns’ Greek Revival style, with Doric simplicity and nautical motifs, contrasts with the Baroque exuberance of St. Nicholas’ Naval Cathedral or the Sheremetev Palace, aligning instead with the neoclassical Tavrichesky Palace. Their terra-cotta hue, chosen for visibility, makes them a vivid landmark, though wartime damage from shell fragments required extensive repairs.

 

Cultural and Historical Significance

The Rostral Columns are more than architectural ornaments; they are enduring symbols of Russia’s maritime power and Saint Petersburg’s role as a naval and commercial hub. Their cultural and historical significance spans several dimensions:

Naval Glory: The columns celebrate Russia’s naval triumphs, from Peter the Great’s victories in the Great Northern War to the Russo-Turkish War’s Battle of Chesme, a high point of Russian maritime dominance. The bronze prows, echoing Roman rostral columns like the Columna Rostrata C. Duilii (260 BC), project imperial strength, instilling pride and deterrence, as noted in sources comparing them to New York’s Columbus Monument or Bordeaux’s Quinconces columns. Their placement near the Stock Exchange underscores the link between naval power and economic prosperity, a theme Peter championed.
Maritime Functionality: As 19th-century beacons, the columns were vital to Saint Petersburg’s port, guiding ships through the Neva’s treacherous channels. Historians debate whether they were primarily lighthouses or symbolic monuments, given their urban river setting rather than a coastal one, but their oil lamps were undeniably practical until the port’s 1885 relocation. The gas torches, lit for holidays, maintain this legacy, transforming the columns into a festive spectacle akin to the Palace Bridge’s nightly draw.
Architectural Ensemble: The columns are integral to the Strelka’s Greek Revival ensemble, one of Saint Petersburg’s most elegant architectural compositions. Thomon’s design, pairing the columns with the Stock Exchange’s temple-like facade, creates a harmonious waterfront that rivals Venice’s Piazza San Marco, as noted in UNESCO’s World Heritage designation. Their visibility from the Neva, Hermitage, and Peter and Paul Fortress makes them a defining feature of the city’s skyline, alongside landmarks like St. Isaac’s Cathedral.
Cultural Icon: The columns are a postcard staple, featured on banknotes and in media, from Soviet propaganda to modern tourism campaigns. Their inclusion in the Unified State Register of Cultural Heritage Objects underscores their national importance. They evoke Saint Petersburg’s identity as a city of water and power, complementing smaller monuments like the Chizhik-Pyzhik and grand ones like the Alexander Column, though their naval focus is unique.
Resilience and Restoration: The columns’ survival through the Great Patriotic War, despite shrapnel damage, mirrors the city’s endurance, seen in sites like Finland Station during the Siege of Leningrad. Restorations in 1926–1928, 1947–1949, and 1998–1999 preserved their integrity, though the use of copper replicas for prows raises questions about authenticity, a debate echoed in the Blagoveshchensky Bridge’s steel upgrades.
The columns’ dual role as beacons and victory monuments distinguishes them from purely commemorative structures like the Alexander Column, while their riverfront setting ties them to Saint Petersburg’s canal-laden identity, akin to the Literary Café’s Moika views. Their Roman-inspired design reflects Russia’s aspiration to inherit classical imperial grandeur, a theme Peter the Great advanced through the Kunstkamera.

 

Modern Role and Visitor Experience

As of 2025, the Rostral Columns are a public, open-air monument, accessible 24/7 at Birzhevaya Ploshchad, Vasilievsky Island, with no admission fee. Located near the Palace Bridge and Exchange Bridge, they are a short walk from metro stations Vasileostrovskaya or Sportivnaya, and easily reached from the Peter and Paul Fortress (1 km) or Hermitage (1.5 km). Their central location makes them a staple of city tours, boat excursions, and self-guided walks, particularly during the white nights (late May to early July), when the Neva’s reflections enhance their glow.

Visitors can photograph the columns from multiple angles: close-up to capture the prows and river sculptures, or from across the Neva for a panoramic view with the Winter Palace. The park around the columns, with benches and river views, is a popular spot for photos, especially during gas-torch lightings on holidays like Victory Day or Navy Day, which draw crowds for their fiery spectacle. Boat tours along the Neva, offered by operators like Astra Marine, provide a unique perspective, passing directly beneath the columns.

Tripadvisor reviews (4.5/5 from ~170 reviews) praise the columns’ “magnificent scenery” and “historical meaning,” noting their visibility from afar and the park’s photo opportunities. Some visitors find them “not a must-see” unless paired with nearby attractions like the Kunstkamera (0.5 km), Zoological Museum (0.3 km), or Central Naval Museum (in the Stock Exchange). The lack of interpretive signage, a common issue in Saint Petersburg sites like the Finland Station, can leave tourists unaware of the columns’ history, though guided tours (~3,000 rubles, $30 USD) from agencies like Guide For You Tours fill this gap.

The columns’ ceremonial torch lightings, managed by the city, are a highlight, though an unauthorized lighting in 2011 by an unknown individual exposed security vulnerabilities, quickly addressed by firefighters. The columns’ integration into the Strelka’s ensemble, with the Naval Museum and nearby Academy of Arts, makes them a cultural anchor, though their open-air nature exposes them to weathering, requiring ongoing maintenance. Tourism websites like visit-petersburg.ru and saint-petersburg.com offer details on nearby events and tours.

 

Critical Analysis

The Rostral Columns are a masterstroke of architectural symbolism, blending Greek Revival elegance with Roman martial tradition to celebrate Russia’s naval might. Thomon’s design, aligning the columns with the Stock Exchange’s temple-like facade, creates a cohesive ensemble that elevates Vasilievsky Island’s Strelka to one of Saint Petersburg’s most iconic vistas, rivaling the Palace Square’s Alexander Column. Their dual function as beacons and victory monuments reflects a pragmatic yet grandiose vision, echoing Peter the Great’s blend of utility and ambition in sites like the Kunstkamera.

However, the columns’ narrative is narrowly focused on naval triumphs, sidelining broader maritime stories, such as civilian trade or ecological challenges in the Baltic Sea, which could resonate with modern audiences, as suggested for St. Nicholas’ Naval Cathedral. The allegorical river sculptures, while impressive, are ambiguously interpreted as deities or rivers, reflecting a lack of clear documentation from Thomon, a gap that local historians have filled with assumptions. The use of copper prows, rather than authentic captured rostra, dilutes their Roman authenticity, though this artistic choice enhances their visual impact, unlike the Alexander Column’s precise historical tribute to 1812–1814 victories.

The columns’ practical role as lighthouses is debated, with some historians arguing their urban river setting made them symbolic rather than essential, especially compared to coastal beacons like those in Vladivostok’s rostral columns. Their high maintenance costs, noted as a reason for decommissioning in the 20th century, highlight the tension between functionality and symbolism, a challenge absent in purely decorative monuments like the Chizhik-Pyzhik.

Restoration efforts, while preserving the columns’ form, have introduced replicas, raising questions about historical fidelity, a critique echoed in the Sheremetev Palace’s garden losses. The lack of multilingual signage or an on-site exhibit, unlike the Literary Café’s contextual displays, limits educational impact, particularly for international visitors who dominate Saint Petersburg’s tourism. The columns’ prominence in Soviet and post-Soviet imagery, from banknotes to propaganda, reflects their adaptability to shifting ideologies, but their imperial origins may alienate those critical of Russia’s naval expansionism, a nuance rarely addressed in official narratives.

The columns’ open-air accessibility is a strength, democratizing their enjoyment compared to restricted sites like the Tavrichesky Palace, but their exposure to vandalism (e.g., the 2011 torch incident) and weathering demands vigilant upkeep. Integrating digital guides or augmented reality, as modern museums like the Hermitage explore, could enhance engagement without altering the columns’ physical integrity.